[boost] Re: boost/mpl/integral_c.hpp and Borland

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-31 19:58:13

Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Dave,
>
> Your change to boost/mpl/integral_c.hpp broke a lot of
> Borland 5.61 compiles.

I thought something like that might happen on the broken compilers.  I
don't really know what the best approach here might be, other than to
take out casts for those compilers.  I'm not even sure if
integral_c<some_enum,...> (which is what the change accomodates) is
appropriate.  Perhaps we should have enum_c with no next,prior for
this purpose.

> See the Win32 tests just posted.
>
> --Beman
>
>
>

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution