From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-03 01:32:09
"Jason Shirk" <jasonsh_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> If you aren't getting reasonably prompt responses to questions like
> this on MS newsgroups, send me a private email and I'll definitely
> follow up.
Thanks for the offer.
> As usual, you are absolutely correct. Backwards compatibility in
> our object model is critical. I seriously doubt we'll ever do the
> ZBO by default.
What can you say about empty member optimization in VC6.5 and
later? Also, do you have any idea why an empty class that inherits
from non-empty bases would be bigger than the sum of the size of
the bases? Obviously, trivial test cases do not show this behaviour,
but the policy_ptr in the sandbox does (though you'll probably have
to wait till Monday afternoon for me to check in the latest version).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk