Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-11 06:36:56

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Config] Request for new config macro"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: [test] "unix" identification"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Request: BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG"
Next in thread: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Re: Request: BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG"
Reply: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Re: Request: BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG"

> Could we subordinate BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG to
> defined(BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG)?

I would rather that BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG was just not defined in the first
place when EDG is in strict mode - any ideas?

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Config] Request for new config macro"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: [test] "unix" identification"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Request: BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG"
Next in thread: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Re: Request: BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG"
Reply: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Re: Request: BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk