[boost] Re: Re: condition::notify_all

From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-18 13:42:00

William E. Kempf wrote:
> Michael Glassford said:
>> Scott McCaskill wrote:
>>> I was just looking at the win32 implementation of the
>>> condition variable class in the thread library and
>>> noticed something odd.  In version 1.7 of
>>> condition.cpp, there is a bug fix for
>>> condition::notify_one.  At the beginning of the
>>> function, a mutex is acquired, but not all control
>>> paths resulted in the mutex being released.  Part of
>>> the fix involved making sure that the mutex is always
>>> released.
>>>
>>> However, it looks like the same behavior still exists
>>> in the current version of condition.cpp for notify_all
>>> (win32)--not all control paths will release the mutex.
>>>  Am I mistaken, or is this a bug?
>>
>> It looks the same to me. Any comment about this?
>
> I somehow missed the original post here.  Now fixed in CVS.

Thanks for looking into it,

Mike