From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-18 20:58:44
At 05:26 PM 2/18/2003, Bo Persson wrote:
>A lot of the failures seems to be a "warning" that 7.1 actually does the
>right thing. A bit unfair to count this as a failure!
Warnings aren't counted as failures. A test compile, link, or run has to
actually report failure (via non-zero return code).
I've cleared the boost\type_traits\is_convertible.hpp(154) problem. That
accounted for a dozen or so failures, so the results are looking even
better. Failure rate dropped to 8%.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk