[boost] Re: smart_ptr vs smart_resource

From: Michel André (michel.andre_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-21 15:48:37

Is shared_count scheduled to come out from the detail namespace and be
publically available and maybe a bit documented?

I don't think we should encourage users to use things from detail namespace?

/Michel

Phil Nash wrote:
> Peter suggested I use shared_count when I first started talking about
> smart_resource (or shared_resource as I was then calling it) over a
> year
> ago - so it's not a new thing :-)
>
> [)o
> IhIL..