From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-25 10:00:35
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 08:34 AM 2/25/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> Go ahead and make the change, unless someone voices an objection.
> >> I'm wondering how may other places we have similar problems?
> >Now you know why I've been making such a stink about insidious ADL!
> >> Is there any programatic way to detect them?
> >I've been trying to get compiler vendors to add a warning for names to
> >which ADL applies but which are found in the local namespace. This,
> >at least, would give us a way to detect likely candidates. No takers
> >yet :(.
> Hum, it looks like Microsoft took you up on it.
Well, it was MS I was haranguing most-loudly about it.
> See the shared_ptr_test warning on the VC++ 7.1 beta regression
I've seen that. It's a different warning IIUC. Doesn't it go off
whether or not you find the overload in the same namespace the search
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk