Re: [boost] checked_delete.hpp fix

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-25 10:00:35

Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At 08:34 AM 2/25/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>  >Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
>  >
>  >> Go ahead and make the change, unless someone voices an objection.
>  >>
>  >> I'm wondering how may other places we have similar problems?
>  >
>  >Now you know why I've been making such a stink about insidious ADL!
>  >
>  >> Is there any programatic way to detect them?
>  >
>  >I've been trying to get compiler vendors to add a warning for names to
>  >which ADL applies but which are found in the local namespace.  This,
>  >at least, would give us a way to detect likely candidates.  No takers
>  >yet :(.
>
> Hum, it looks like Microsoft took you up on it. 

Well, it was MS I was haranguing most-loudly about it.

> See the shared_ptr_test warning on the VC++ 7.1 beta regression
> test.

I've seen that.  It's a different warning IIUC.  Doesn't it go off
whether or not you find the overload in the same namespace the search
started from?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com