From: Jason Shirk (jasonsh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-25 18:51:10
From: David Abrahams
>> Hum, it looks like Microsoft took you up on it.
>Well, it was MS I was haranguing most-loudly about it.
I don't recall a discussion on warnings about ADL, I'll need a refresher. I do recall a discussion we had on non-dependent names.
>> See the shared_ptr_test warning on the VC++ 7.1 beta regression
>I've seen that. It's a different warning IIUC. Doesn't it go off
>whether or not you find the overload in the same namespace the search
The warning we added in VC7.1 was purely to diagnose behavior changes due to the implementation of ADL on ordinary function calls. I can't think of a scenario where it would warn as you suggest.
VC++ Compiler Team
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk