From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-25 10:01:54
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Hum, it looks like Microsoft took you up on it. See the
>> shared_ptr_test warning on the VC++ 7.1 beta regression test.
> No, C4675 is the opposite of what Dave wants. Earlier MSVC didn't support
> ADL at all, and MSVC 7.1 is now issuing the warning for every place ADL
> kicks in since this may alter the behavior of existing code. Dave wants a
> warning when ADL could have kicked in but didn't.
Or rather, where it did kick in but it found nothing, so the fallback
was the name in the local namespace.
> Sounds like a neat plan to solicit _many_ user complaints. ;-)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk