Re: [boost] Re: resource manager naming

From: Brian Gray (briangray_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-27 13:01:43

On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:15 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> "Sam Partington" <Sam.Partington_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Could it not just be called shared.  After all it is merely a more 
>> general
>> term of shared_ptr.  And the type of the resource kind of makes it 
>> implicit.
>
> std::auto_ptr is a non-shared resource manager.

So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or just 
managed<>.

  -- Brian