Re: [boost] Re: resource manager naming

From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-27 18:17:58

Brian Gray wrote:
> On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:15 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Sam Partington" <Sam.Partington_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>>> Could it not just be called shared.  After all it is merely a more
>>> general
>>> term of shared_ptr.  And the type of the resource kind of makes it
>>> implicit.
>> 
>> std::auto_ptr is a non-shared resource manager.
> 
> So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or just
> managed<>.

Why not just resource<>? Management is implied anyway; that's the reason
for the existence of the class.

-- 
Joel de Guzman
joel at boost-consulting.com
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net