From: Ed Brey (brey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-03 15:38:02
Keith Burton wrote:
> In lieu of a zip file , I would vote for inclusion on the basis of
> previous use of the io state savers
The subject of this review is the delta between the previous accepted I/O library and Daryle's updated version. The state savers are part of the existing and are not up for review (although comments are always welcome). The file more_io.zip contains only elements of the I/O library that are new and hence up for review.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk