From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-06 14:31:22
"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:
> --- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > Is the __BORLANDC__ branch different from (not as good as) the
>> > is_base_and_derived implementation in 1.29.0?
>> cvs diff knows for sure.
> Sure, but this "chasing tails" game is impractical. If nobody else
> cares about MIPSpro compatibility we will just keep using 1.29.0.
What will you do when 1.31.0 comes out?
> I'd like to suggest opening a 1.29 maintenance branch. I've
> accumulated a few minor patches that make Boost.Python 1.29.0
> compatible with Python 2.3. If I could check these patches in they
> would be available to everybody.
You're welcome to do that as far as I'm concerned. I think it would
be better to make the trunk work, but only you can decide what's worth
spending your time on.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk