|
Boost : |
From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-06 14:50:37
>
> > in favor of 80-column text is just that
>
> > So I wondered what the general opinion of boost developers
> is on this issue,
>
> I am in favor of 72 column lines myself. This allows me to have three
> comfortable columns of code on the screen at once.
This is namely the reason why I would prefer longer lines. On majority on
modern monitors 80-column text fit to left 1/3 of monitor space, leaving 2/3
blank.
>From "idiological prospective" you won't find too many reasons to defend
80-column limitation. We tend to use more and more explicit namespace
specifications, a lot of template parameters, effectively making even simple
assignment to spread on multiple lines (and less readable) would you stick
to 80-column. Unless you try to put several statements on the same line, I
prefer to see it long not separated. On the other hand, I admit that there
are still as lot of people using vi through terminal connection.
Gennadiy.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk