[boost] Re: PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-10 05:14:55

Beman Dawes wrote:

> At 09:00 AM 2/18/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> 
>  >Hi there,
>  >
>  >currently, the is_member_func_test fails for VACPP6 with the following
>  >error messages:
>  >
>  >"/home/auto/schoepf/src/extern/boost-cvs/boost/type_traits/is_member_functio
>  >n_pointer.hpp",
>  >line 37.29: 1540-1206 (S) The class template instantiation of
>  >"is_mem_fun_pointer_impl<void (UDT::*)()>" is ambiguous.
>  >"/home/auto/schoepf/src/extern/boost-
>  >...
> 
>  >When looking at is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp it looks like the
>  >Metrowerks compiler has the same problem. Could anyone please add a
>  >check for __IBMCPP__ <=600 at line 345 of this file and regenerate it?
> 
> Markus,
> 
> It doesn't look like this change was ever made. Would you still like to 
> see it made? Does anyone have an objection? It would only affect the IBM 
> compiler.

Yes, please go ahead and make the change. I didn't want to change that 
header on my own. And besides that, it needs regeneration after the 
change and I can't find any docs on how this has to be done.

> (I'm trying to make sure that patches haven't fallen on the floor. 
> Please excuse the bother if the patch was not applied because it was 
> rejected, and I just didn't see any message indicating that.)
> 
> I'll make the change if it is still needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Beman

Thanks for your efforts.

Markus