From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-10 05:14:55
Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 09:00 AM 2/18/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >currently, the is_member_func_test fails for VACPP6 with the following
> >error messages:
> >line 37.29: 1540-1206 (S) The class template instantiation of
> >"is_mem_fun_pointer_impl<void (UDT::*)()>" is ambiguous.
> >When looking at is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp it looks like the
> >Metrowerks compiler has the same problem. Could anyone please add a
> >check for __IBMCPP__ <=600 at line 345 of this file and regenerate it?
> It doesn't look like this change was ever made. Would you still like to
> see it made? Does anyone have an objection? It would only affect the IBM
Yes, please go ahead and make the change. I didn't want to change that
header on my own. And besides that, it needs regeneration after the
change and I can't find any docs on how this has to be done.
> (I'm trying to make sure that patches haven't fallen on the floor.
> Please excuse the bother if the patch was not applied because it was
> rejected, and I just didn't see any message indicating that.)
> I'll make the change if it is still needed.
Thanks for your efforts.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk