From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-12 08:20:01
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>>>currently, the is_member_func_test fails for VACPP6 with the
>>>following error messages:
>>>When looking at is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp it looks like the
>>>Metrowerks compiler has the same problem. Could anyone please add
>>>a check for __IBMCPP__ <=600 at line 345 of this file and
>>The fix still seems missing. If anyone can please tell me how to
>>correctly regenerate the file I can fix it on my own.
> Should be as simple as creating a two-line source file:
> #define BOOST_TT_PREPROCESSING_MODE
> #include "boost/type_traits/detail/is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp"
> preprocessing it, and replacing "//: #" by "#" in the resulting output.
> Well, that won't give you a drop-in replacement for the original
> "detail/is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp" header, of course, but instead a
> re-generated block of 'is_mem_fun_pointer_impl' specializations to copy &
> paste there.
Aleksey, thanks for the instructions. Could you tell me which PP you
used to generate the file before? I would like to minimize the diff as
much as possible?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk