From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-12 18:07:54
"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Yes, what I cannot figure out is whether the "Preliminary submission"
> step can be reached with a non boostified libary (like mine is now) or
> whether it is assumed the library should be Boost-friendly by this stage.
I'd say 6 or 7 people expressing interest is more than enough to justify
Boostifying the code at this stage. However, I would like to see what
your latest version looks like, and see if we can't perhaps redesign some
of the features that run afoul of non-standard C++. Also, it looks like the
early consensus is that multi-key/value support is desired, so I think we
should have a good look at your implementation/design to see if it is
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk