From: Fernando Cacciola (software_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-13 11:03:49
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME
> >> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey?
> > >Dave A. introduced the macro I would prefer him to change it as he
> >>what's required - or have I nissed something?
> > BTW, I've used BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME in my own code with bcc5.5.1
> > this compiler ICEs sometimes if typename is given inside <>, as in
> > typedef foo< typename bar::type > the_foo ;
> > but not always, so I'm not sure what to do in general.
> I guess that rules out BOOST_MSVC_TYPENAME as a name.
> Is typename ever required with BCC 5.5.1?
With BCC5.5.1 typename is _never required_ AFAIK, but it is with BCC5.6.0(4)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk