RE: [boost] RC_1_30_0 still broken (apologies and help!)

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-16 21:39:07

At 09:20 PM 3/16/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

 >Beman Dawes wrote:
 >> Both the main trunk and RC_1_30_0 are working fine for me as
 >> of Sunday 6PM US Eastern time.

I was unclear; the CVS lock problem was cleared, not the is_class problems.

 >> Today's Win32 RC_1_30_0 regression tests (just posted) are
 >> showing new  fails for VC++ 6 and VC++ 7 on is_polymorphic_test and
 >> is_reference_test.
 >> Are these related to the is_class problem?
 >
 >Yes. We need to revert 'is_class.hpp' to the 1.5 revision, both in the 
main
 >trunk and in the release branch. I am not sure what's the right way to do
 >that, though. I don't think we need to keep the erroneous version in the
 >history, although it's probably not a big deal. Could our CVS experts
 >advice on the situation?

There is probably some easier way, but just updating to 1.5, saving the 
code somewhere, updating to the current revision, replacing that with the 
saved copy, and then committing it should work OK.

Thanks,

--Beman