From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-17 17:48:47
At 05:01 PM 3/17/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> The patch to is_class would work if is_function could be called with
>> a reference, so I think it's worth to consider fixing is_function. As
>> John is the expert, I think he can decide whether it's better to wait
>> for the SourceForge-folks to fix he lock-problem or if it's easy
>> enought (and thus faster) to fix is_function...
>If it was easy enough it would be fixed long before the release. In any
>case, I would be strongly opposite to sticking in a new implementation
>just now. It's bad enough "the patch" got us delayed for more than a
Aleksey has done the revert and the tests that were failing are now
AFAICS, the only outstanding issue is lexical_cast on g++ 2.95.x causing
date_time library failures.
As soon as that is dealt with, we will release. In the meantime, no other
changes should be made to RC_1_30_0 please.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk