[boost] Re: boost::format 1.30.0-b1 (again)

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-18 11:36:36

Does anybody know if this needs fixing, or is it my mistake.  If it 
needs fixing, is someone able to do it before 1.30.0 is released?

Thanks

Russell

Russell Hind wrote:
> Sorry about last post, Mozilla decided to send when I tried to paste 
> stuff into the message (?).  Strange, but probably finger trouble.  Here 
> goes again:
> 
> I have just tried boost::format with C++Builder 6 Update 4 and works 
> fine (simple test), but have to
> 
> #define BOOST_BAD_ISDIGIT
> 
> Looking in format.hpp (line 43) there is
> 
> #if defined(BOOST_NO_STD_LOCALE) || ( BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, <= 
> 0x561) \
>  && BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT( 0x570 ) ) )
> #define BOOST_BAD_ISDIGIT
> #endif
> 
> __BORLANDC__ is now 0x564 after update 4, and still has the problem. 
> Should this be updated to reflect this?
> 
> Also, BCB5 doesn't have the problem (0x551) and neither does BCB6 if you 
> use the rogue wave STL (_USE_OLD_RW_STL) so could these be taken into 
> account?  (or doesn't it really matter, don't currently use locals, so 
> don't know how much enabling this would impact formats use)
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Russell
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>