From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-18 15:46:17
"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:
> --- "Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > Not all^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HNo compilers are perfectly standard-compliant.
>> Ih this case I would not want to make this change. After all it's only
> The patch is only in RC_1_30_0.
> The warnings are creating a lot of noise. As you said the inline is ignored,
> and our multi-platform builds show that all other compilers are quite happy
> with it. I'd highly appreciate if the patch could stay in RC_1_30_0.
The idea that anyone would go out of his way to remove innocuous
warning suppression at this point seems a little perverse to me.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk