From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-24 07:36:33
Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:
> [Cut&paste from your second post:]
> > I'm even inclined to do as other projects do and kill all the
> > underscores, waiting to deal with ambiguity until it arises. It's
> > going to be a *long* time before we have numbers that could conflict.
> Short (or should I say: too short) labels will buy us nothing IMHO. Is
> there any reason for as-short-as-possible labels? I just tried to
> create a non-breaking, readable naming scheme which reflects the
> current use of branches and tags, but I don't have any strong feelings
> about whether it should be used or not...
Me neither. I take it back.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk