Boost logo

Boost :

From: Christoph Kögl (christoph_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-25 05:38:04


You might want to read
http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/lsp.pdf for
a rationale of the LSP. A somewhat different view is expressed in
http://alistair.cockburn.us/crystal/articles/cdos/constructivedesconstructionofsubtyping.htm.

Am Son, 2003-03-23 um 14.00 schrieb David Abrahams:

> LSP is weird anyway. What's the point of polymorphism if you're not
> going to change the behavior of the class in some observable way? If
> the derived class were transparently substitutable for the base class
> it wouldn't be much good, would it?
>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> www.boost-consulting.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk