Boost logo

Boost :

From: Christoph Kögl (christoph_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-25 05:38:04

You might want to read for
a rationale of the LSP. A somewhat different view is expressed in

Am Son, 2003-03-23 um 14.00 schrieb David Abrahams:

> LSP is weird anyway. What's the point of polymorphism if you're not
> going to change the behavior of the class in some observable way? If
> the derived class were transparently substitutable for the base class
> it wouldn't be much good, would it?
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at