From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-26 12:43:24
> Even if none of the above looks sound for you I still argue that
> lexical_cast *should not force* inclusion of typeinfo. It's not
> "inconvinience" - it's showstopper. It's much more important
> than providing
> specific type info. In majority of the cases one knows it anyway.
> > Kevlin
So. Are we gonna stuck with typeinfo in lexical_cast?
Could we have at least some discussion about this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk