Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-26 12:43:24

> Even if none of the above looks sound for you I still argue that
> lexical_cast *should not force* inclusion of typeinfo. It's not
> "inconvinience" - it's showstopper. It's much more important
> than providing
> specific type info. In majority of the cases one knows it anyway.
> > Kevlin
> Gennadiy.

So. Are we gonna stuck with typeinfo in lexical_cast?

Could we have at least some discussion about this?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at