RE: [boost] Statistics refactored

From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-09 17:16:45

This is most interesting - but at the cost of being more complex of course.

Possible extensions to higher moments come to mind, just ot make it even more
complex!

I am still planning to look at a cyclic buffer and using intervals. This
promises to be a nice example of building with Boost Lego?

Paul

Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB  UK
[phone]   Mobile [phone]
Mobile mailto:pabristow_at_[hidden]
mailto:pbristow_at_[hidden]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Neal D. Becker
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 8:49 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Statistics refactored
>
>
> I refactored the statistics class.  I hope it is an improvement.
>
> The change is that estimators for E(x) and E(x^2) are no longer
> fixed, but are
> pluggable template parameters.  By default, first order recursive filters
> would be used (one pole filters).  Any thoughts?  The code is small, so I'll
> just post it here:
>
>