From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-11 04:08:23
David Abrahams wrote:
> hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden] writes:
>> 1. Request for formal Boost review, i.e. try to make Wave a 'normal'
>> library inside of Boost. For this we have to see, if there is enough
>> interest for such a beast (besides to be a preprocessor application,
>> Wave is a preprocessor library, so this may be an option).
> It's not really a library unless it's going to be linked with other
> code, is it?
It is a fundamentally an iterator that spits out C/C++ tokens post
preprocessing, so it can certainly be linked to another tool, etc..
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk