Re: [boost] PP lambda?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-11 03:45:18

hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden] writes:

> 1. Request for formal Boost review, i.e. try to make Wave a 'normal'
> library inside of Boost. For this we have to see, if there is enough
> interest for such a beast (besides to be a preprocessor application,
> Wave is a preprocessor library, so this may be an option).

It's not really a library unless it's going to be linked with other
code, is it?

> 2. Include the Wave application as a supporting tool (as bjam or
> boostbook) into the /boost/tools directory (does this require a
> separate review?)

I don't think so.  We haven't reviewed any boostbook processors or
the build system.

> 3. Include Wave as a preprocessor tool just inside and as a part of the
> Boost.Preprocessor library for those people, who is interested in
> experimenting with Pauls strict pp-lib (codename 'Chaos').

Hmm, sounds wrong to me.

4. Include wave as a Spirit sample application

But I like #2 I think...

Regards,
-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com