RE: [boost] Re: ATTN: All Developers Interested inBoost.Preprocessor

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-14 16:18:31

Paul Mensonides wrote:

> > Any name is fine, I have no strong opinion in fact. "module" just 
> > blends well with "export" and "import" in the Modula-2 sense. So, 
> > there's a precedence, FWIW.
> 
> There is always preference of course, and five different 
> people have five different "favorite sets of names."  This is 
> subjective, yet it is still a valid topic for discussion.  
> Keep in mind however, that of all things, the names chosen 
> are less important than functionality, and are also the most 
> fluid and easy changed.  At this point, the whole idea is 
> somewhat preliminary.

FYI, I've just startet to implement Paul's scoping proposal in Wave
(just to validate the ideas and to allow early feedback). Regarding the
naming I'll use macros (hint, hint) which allows for an easy
configuration of the concrete pp keywords.

Regards Hartmut