From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-23 19:22:33
At 02:51 PM 4/23/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I still feel that a fixed width Unicode encoding has to be an advance
>> variable width encodings like MBCS for any character set.
>I guess that depends on how important random access over the
>characters of a string is to you. To me, it seems like an edge case.
It really doesn't matter what we think - both fixed-width and
variable-width encodings are well established, and not going to go away
anytime soon. So a filesystem library is going to have to cope with both
fixed and variable width external encodings of filenames.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk