From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-23 13:51:40
"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I still feel that a fixed width Unicode encoding has to be an advance over
> variable width encodings like MBCS for any character set.
I guess that depends on how important random access over the
characters of a string is to you. To me, it seems like an edge case.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk