[boost] Re: C++ Standard Library proposal - Math functions for Statistics

From: Daryle Walker (dwalker07_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-25 01:19:00

On Wednesday, April 23, 2003, at 9:21 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:

> I feel Boost can also help by providing just one working 
> implementation, even if just at 32-bit float accuracy, so any vendor 
> who doesn't feel willing or able to provide a better one can still 
> offer the Boost one and claim compliance.

If we start with just one version, wouldn't a "long double" version be 
the best choice.  That way, the "float" and "double" users can get 
answers with quick & dirty conversions.

Daryle