Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn-mycop_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-29 07:34:50

Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> Alternatively, you can implement MPL conformant sequence
>> tuple_sequence<Tuple>. It's not so hard as you can imagine.
>> (Question to MPL's authors: when it will be documented?).

David Abrahams wrote:
> Sequence requirements are already documented:

Yes, you're right, I was able to write *immutable* sequence using only the
documentation but I had to look at MPL code to see how extensible sequences
are implemented. After all, I decided to specialize push_front, pop_front,
push_back and pop_back for function_arguments. And I asked primarely about
documenting it (or may be there is a better way?).

> That's not (I think) what Alexander had in mind: IIUC he was talking
> about a wrapper over tuples such that:
> tuple_sequence<some_tuple>
> is an MPL sequence. Of course, a better solution would be to
> specialize begin/end so that any Boost tuple is *itself* an MPL
> sequence.

That would be great.

Alexander Nasonov
Remove minus and all between minus and at from my e-mail for timely response

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at