From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-29 08:12:14
Alexander Nasonov <alnsn-mycop_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>>> Alternatively, you can implement MPL conformant sequence
>>> tuple_sequence<Tuple>. It's not so hard as you can imagine.
>>> (Question to MPL's authors: when it will be documented?).
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Sequence requirements are already documented:
> Yes, you're right, I was able to write *immutable* sequence using only the
> documentation but I had to look at MPL code to see how extensible sequences
> are implemented.
How does that help with your own sequence? It seems to me that (given
a conforming compiler), the concept docs should be sufficient.
>> is an MPL sequence. Of course, a better solution would be to
>> specialize begin/end so that any Boost tuple is *itself* an MPL
> That would be great.
Would you like to propose a patch for the current CVS tuples?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk