From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-30 08:45:30
At 12:14 AM 4/27/2003, Trevor Taylor wrote:
>So it sounds to me like the :blat is *not* part of the extension. It
>sounds like the NT file name is made up of three parts: name, extension
>In which case I think it is fine to have functions extension() and
>change_extension() - they just should not report or modify the stream
>To implement them I guess I'd need to know whether the file name was an
>NTFS filename, and then how to reliably locate the "extension" part?
>Just my 2 cents...
Many legacy filesystems append version or similar identification to file
names, often using ':' as a delimiter.
OTOH, ':' is a valid character in a file name (and in an extension) on many
Trying to distinguish between those two cases on an operating system by
operating system basis just doesn't seem possible. Better to only promise
what we are sure can be delivered - in other words, Vladimir's suggested
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk