From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-02 07:06:28
Thomas Witt wrote:
> What was the rationale for not supporting assignment to uninitialized
> optionals? IIRC this was possible in earlier versions
No, it was not, but still why isn't it supported?
-- Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001 http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk