[boost] Re: [optional] question

From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-06 20:20:48

"Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:3EB25F44.9020401_at_ive.uni-hannover.de...
> Thomas Witt wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What was the rationale for not supporting assignment to uninitialized
> > optionals? IIRC this was possible in earlier versions
>
> No, it was not, but still why isn't it supported?
>
> Thomas
>
I'm preparing a FAQ section to add to the docs which answers this and other
frequently asked questions.
I'll let you know when I finish.

Fernando Cacciola