From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-06 20:20:48
"Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> Thomas Witt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What was the rationale for not supporting assignment to uninitialized
> > optionals? IIRC this was possible in earlier versions
> No, it was not, but still why isn't it supported?
I'm preparing a FAQ section to add to the docs which answers this and other
frequently asked questions.
I'll let you know when I finish.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk