Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-02 11:33:21

At 09:44 AM 5/2/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>"Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>> * Do TR components need a formal review?
>>> Some kind of review is needed to ensure quality, but the process
>>> should be simplified compared to a normal formal review. Details
>>> need to be worked out.
>> As alluded to by Beman, there was a previous discussion between me,
>> Doug, Dave and Jaakko. There's an implementation of the TR compliant
>> version of the tuple library written by Jaakko and me a few months ago.
>> Right now, it is still in the Spirit CVS. Some of us would like to have

>> in boost's CVS in the tuple directory. I asked for a go signal. So far,
>> Dave, Jaakko and Doug gave it a go. If a formal review is required, I
>> guess I can't proceed yet at this point?
>> I await your comments regarding this matter.
>I think a careful review of the implementation is required, but maybe
>it doesn't rise to the level of a formal review.

Yes, that was what I was thinking. At the very minimum, someone not part of
the development effort should look over the code.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at