Re: [boost] Re: Boost implementation of the Library TR?

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-02 11:33:21

At 09:44 AM 5/2/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
 >"Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]> writes:
 >
 >> Beman Dawes wrote:
 >>
 >>> * Do TR components need a formal review?
 >>>
 >>>     Some kind of review is needed to ensure quality, but the process
 >>>     should be simplified compared to a normal formal review. Details
 >>>     need to be worked out.
 >>
 >> As alluded to by Beman, there was a previous discussion between me,
 >> Doug, Dave and Jaakko. There's an implementation of the TR compliant
 >> version of the tuple library written by Jaakko and me a few months ago.
 >> Right now, it is still in the Spirit CVS. Some of us would like to have 

 >it
 >> in boost's CVS in the tuple directory. I asked for a go signal. So far,
 >> Dave, Jaakko and Doug gave it a go. If a formal review is required, I
 >> guess I can't proceed yet at this point?
 >>
 >> I await your comments regarding this matter.
 >
 >I think a careful review of the implementation is required, but maybe
 >it doesn't rise to the level of a formal review.

Yes, that was what I was thinking. At the very minimum, someone not part of 
the development effort should look over the code.

--Beman