[boost] Re: Boost implementation of the Library TR?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-02 08:44:25

"Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Beman Dawes wrote:
>
>> * Do TR components need a formal review?
>> 
>>     Some kind of review is needed to ensure quality, but the process
>>     should be simplified compared to a normal formal review. Details
>>     need to be worked out.
>
> As alluded to by Beman, there was a previous discussion between me,
> Doug, Dave and Jaakko. There's an implementation of the TR compliant
> version of the tuple library written by Jaakko and me a few months ago.
> Right now, it is still in the Spirit CVS. Some of us would like to have it
> in boost's CVS in the tuple directory. I asked for a go signal. So far,
> Dave, Jaakko and Doug gave it a go. If a formal review is required, I
> guess I can't proceed yet at this point? 
>
> I await your comments regarding this matter. 

I think a careful review of the implementation is required, but maybe
it doesn't rise to the level of a formal review.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com