From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-02 08:44:25
"Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> * Do TR components need a formal review?
>> Some kind of review is needed to ensure quality, but the process
>> should be simplified compared to a normal formal review. Details
>> need to be worked out.
> As alluded to by Beman, there was a previous discussion between me,
> Doug, Dave and Jaakko. There's an implementation of the TR compliant
> version of the tuple library written by Jaakko and me a few months ago.
> Right now, it is still in the Spirit CVS. Some of us would like to have it
> in boost's CVS in the tuple directory. I asked for a go signal. So far,
> Dave, Jaakko and Doug gave it a go. If a formal review is required, I
> guess I can't proceed yet at this point?
> I await your comments regarding this matter.
I think a careful review of the implementation is required, but maybe
it doesn't rise to the level of a formal review.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk