Re: [boost] Re: in/out parameters, codingstylesandmaintenance

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-03 14:15:03

"It's not possible"  --- JML
"Yes it is....show me an example" --- TS

Ummmm, I think you got it backwards Terje
At Saturday 5/3/2003 11:53 AM, you wrote:
> >From: "Justin M. Lewis" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>
> > It would be good for code that's going to become old.  It would be good in
>a
> > case where you know the code is going to have to be supported for years.
>
>All the more reason for using good names, etc.
>
> > And as I've already point out, it's not possible to make a function's
>intent
> > clear with a name.
>
>I've yet to see a convincing example of that. Do you have any?
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Terje
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"