Re: [boost] Re: in/out parameters, codingstylesandmaintenance

From: Terje Slettebø (tslettebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-03 13:53:26

>From: "Justin M. Lewis" <boost_at_[hidden]>

> It would be good for code that's going to become old.  It would be good in
a
> case where you know the code is going to have to be supported for years.

All the more reason for using good names, etc.

> And as I've already point out, it's not possible to make a function's
intent
> clear with a name.

I've yet to see a convincing example of that. Do you have any?

Regards,

Terje