|
Boost : |
From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-03 16:26:10
in a word, yes.
At Saturday 5/3/2003 12:42 PM, you wrote:
> >From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]>
>
> > "It's not possible" --- JML
> > "Yes it is....show me an example" --- TS
> >
> > Ummmm, I think you got it backwards Terje
>
>No, I haven't, but I think you've misunderstood.
>
>I meant, show me an example of a function where you think it's impossible to
>just use name, to convey the meaning.
>
>His statement was: "And as I've already point out, it's not possible to make
>a function's intent clear with a name."
>
>Do you still think I've got it backwards?
>
>It's an attempt of getting the discussion more concrete, with actual code.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Terje
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk