Re: [boost] Re: smart assert (was: ENFORCE/ better assertion technique)

From: John Torjo (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-08 03:12:20

>
> > TRUE!!!
> > I could allow for BOOST_VERIFY - something like the MFC's VERIFY.
> > And, I will have to allow for some syntax to be able to return something
> > from the function.
>
> I think ENFORCE_ASSERT would be a bit confusing. Enforcements and
assertions
> serve very very different purposes. How about ALWAYS_ASSERT?
>
True. Do you think BOOST_VERIFY is not a good-enough name?
It seems pretty ok to me.

Best,
John