Re: [boost] Re: Virtual Constructor submission (a.k.a. ctor_fn())

From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-19 11:44:00

Anthony Liguori <anthony_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Well, I've always taken a virtual constructor just to mean a method to
> allocate objects whereas the type isn't known at compile time (you can
> think of virtual methods in the same light).

Is seems to be some unusual implementation of Factory Pattern. Could you
please elaborate little more here ?

B.