From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-19 11:44:00
Anthony Liguori <anthony_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Well, I've always taken a virtual constructor just to mean a method to
> allocate objects whereas the type isn't known at compile time (you can
> think of virtual methods in the same light).
Is seems to be some unusual implementation of Factory Pattern. Could you
please elaborate little more here ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk