Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-23 17:31:50

Next message: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: Regression tests for Linux gcc 2.95.3 [-stlport] and operators.hpp"
Previous message: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] Re: current_function.hpp: more"
In reply to: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Next in thread: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] Re: current_function.hpp: more"

Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
>
> For the sake of doing things correctly, I did reinstall an older
> version
> of the compiler; and now I can say for sure that the 6.0 version was
> already handling __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ (and __FUNCTION__).

Thanks again. I've updated current_function.hpp.

Next message: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: Regression tests for Linux gcc 2.95.3 [-stlport] and operators.hpp"
Previous message: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] Re: current_function.hpp: more"
In reply to: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Next in thread: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] Re: current_function.hpp: more"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk