From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-27 05:23:36
Trevor Taylor wrote:
> Why wait? With so many people contributing to boost, why not introduce a
> pthread_refcount_t into into boost threads (or is there one already?),
> provide a default implementation equivalent to what shared_ptr does now,
Nah. atomic<> based stuff would surely be much better than what shared_ptr
does now, I think.
> and let the platform experts provide the optimal specialisations.
(Subject: Re: Is this thread-safe on multi-processor Win32?)
P.S. ``Where's Bill?'' ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk