Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-02 06:05:54

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Better Intel-Win32 support"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Better Intel-Win32 support"
In reply to: Misha Bergal: "[boost] boost:program_options use case and review"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "[boost] Re: boost:program_options use case and review"

"Misha Bergal" <mbergal_at_[hidden]> writes:

> It seems to be important to support the handling of this syntax style,
> because:
> 1. It seems to be very "widespread", meaning the number of people, not
> necessarily the number of products.

That seems to be the cvs style, also, FWIW.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Better Intel-Win32 support"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Better Intel-Win32 support"
In reply to: Misha Bergal: "[boost] boost:program_options use case and review"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "[boost] Re: boost:program_options use case and review"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk