|
Boost : |
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-13 15:29:03
Reece Dunn wrote:
> Hamish Mackenzie wrote:
>
>> How do you feel about having a node_reference instead.
>
>
> What are the access differences? I.e. could you use '.' to access
> attributes/methods as opposed to '->'?
yes of course, that's the whole point: it's a wrapper around a C
pointer, endowed with all the methods you would expect in a C++ xml API.
But, much like in my original proposal, these methods are very thin
wrappers that delegate the call to libxml2.
Regards,
Stefan
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk