From: Greg Comeau (comeau_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-14 16:45:21
In article <320101c31fbd$f84f6a60$c64f2697_at_bagio>,
Giovanni Bajo <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> * Causes a few tests which use Microsoft headers to fail with errors which
>> actually should be just warnings with --a option. This has been reported
>> to Comeau.
>Well, Comeau in strict mode (--a) defines BOOST_DISABLE_WIN32, so it should
>never include any Windows header. That's because we know that Windows
>headers can't be compiled in strict mode, can they?
That doesn't not seem to be occurring.
But then I'm confused.... because this implies windows.h is
not necessary in order to achieve passing the test?
I'm fairly certain I did tests which effectively no-op'd
windows.h and there were still MSisms being used. ???
-- Greg Comeau/ 184.108.40.206: FULL CORE LANGUAGE, INCLUDING TC1 Comeau C/C++ ONLINE ==> http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout World Class Compilers: Breathtaking C++, Amazing C99, Fabulous C90. Comeau C/C++ with Dinkumware's Libraries... Have you tried it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk