Re: [boost] Compiler status for GCC 3.3

From: Joerg Walter (jhr.walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-05 04:20:13

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Compiler status for GCC 3.3

[...]

> | I'm not sure about this. Paul C. Leopardi and Guillaume Melquiond
already
> | reported the issue, Paul also analyzed it here
> | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ublas-dev/message/676
> |
> | In essence: setting -fabi-version=0 should solve the problem.
>
> On the other hand if your native compiler is GCC and your system was
> not configured with that setting, then you may get into trouble --
> since you'll be mixing translation units with different ABIs.

It sounds as if GCC 3.3 itself could be affected by -fabi-version=?. If say
for example libstdc++ isn't binary compatible when build with
different -fabi-version settings don't we have two different compilers
depending on configure's -fabi-version then?

Thanks,
Joerg